Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
终究比第一部差一点，最后结尾稍微肉麻了些，其他部分都很好，还是希望能有下一部
给个及格分吧……周三和她妈一模一样，咋可能不是亲生的
好家伙，感觉小孩子不能看吧，看的我都有点瘆得慌。不过美国人脑洞是大，这都啥剧情都能想出来，哈哈哈哈哈。佩服
作为演员肉身的东木，作为活跃银幕半个世纪的角色形象之总和的东木，和作为本片导演和主演的东木，如此之多的印记挤压在了同一具苍老的身躯之中，观众无法从过往的观影经验中完全剔除所有关于他的印象，他当然也不能。在这种情况下，“迟缓”和“愚钝”似乎是一种状态的必须，似乎只有通过这样才能触碰到某些真实的东西，但我说不清楚那是什么。
情节很正能量，一点也不哥特，只有妆容造型哥特而已。
颜色太多了，一点都不亚当斯，比第一部差很多，比真人版差更多
没看过原版电影，感觉还不错啦，虽然不喜欢结局。立刻去补电影
话说亚当斯的剧情不是一直都没啥新奇的吗，动作和场景的小细节设计才是亚当斯好玩的地方啊，在喷什么
太普通的动画片套路，好好的一个id搞成了庸俗作品。和后期的憨豆有什么区别。
早先看过1993和1998版。2019的电影也是第一时间去电影看了。但是这部，真的不好看……
后面有些无聊了 // Christmas movie marathon
我还是蛮喜欢这亚当斯一家，黑色幽默还是蛮多的，只是剧情稍微弱了一点，还是可以看看的。
原来有前作啊，怪不得这么有意思的设定配这么水的剧情。。唯一可看的就是歌还不错
比第一部弱了不少 剧情走向生硬 也没有很吸引人的新角色 狗尾续貂了属于是
B+ / 完美的世界-骡子-哭泣的男人，一条公路的温柔延续，老与少的对谈，人生走入末年之时又是新一轮的寻找。电影内外的硬汉形象被意外的自反，masculinity得以被消解，让男人哭泣，忧伤，但绝不悲观。
我们不得不学会慢慢接受他的“倚老卖老”
《哭泣的男人》隐约有些《廊桥遗梦》+《完美的世界》的味道，但克林特·伊斯特伍德老爷子毕竟已是91岁鲐背之年，片子的整体精细程度已不如已成传奇的两部前作，不过个人风格仍是满满，豪放不羁，欹嵚历落。牛仔迟暮，壮心不已，片中酒馆老板娘的话才是画龙点睛：“我做我想做的事，无须别人来告诉我该怎么做。”主题曲为影片增色不少，值得单曲循环一整天。（《Sabor a Mí》《Find a New Home》）
人老了，牛仔都开始拍童话了
一个牛仔身体老了，但牛仔的心永恒！
合家欢，失去亚当斯的特质。八爪鱼菲斯特大战四不像的时候，我真是笑出声。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
